Google

Santorum: No Longer A By-Product Of Anal Sex, According To Google

Google

As Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum loses two primary races to rival Mitt Romney, perhaps he can console himself with, ironically, another loss. Spreading Santorum, the page defining “santorum” as a by-product of anal sex, has finally dropped from the top results on Google. The related anti-Santorum blog, however, remains.

Full article: http://searchengineland.com/santorum-no-longer-a-byproduc...

Tweets

@ilyaNeverSleeps » 10 Mar '12, 8pm
Someone at Google likes Santorum "Spreading Santorum" Drops in Google Rankings [link] via @sengineland
@Kole_tech » 08 Mar '12, 7pm
#spreadingsantorum.com rank has dropped on #Google search of #Santorum. Click and link now! [link]
@lauralippay » 08 Mar '12, 3am
Just saw @sengineland's articles on the #santorum search results mentioned w/ screenshots on @maddow! [link] (Yay SEL!)
@twilight2000 » 08 Mar '12, 2am
RT @MaddowApp: “Spreading Santorum” Drops At Google; New Site Keeps Anal Sex Definition At Number One [link] #Maddow
@MaddowApp » 08 Mar '12, 2am
“Spreading Santorum” Drops At Google; New Site Keeps Anal Sex Definition At Number One [link] #Maddow
@peterfromottawa » 05 Mar '12, 7pm
LINK AND +1 ASAP!!! "Spreading Santorum" Drops At Google; [link] cc @fakedansavage
@evilbachus » 04 Mar '12, 11pm
A Google search algorithm change is hurting the ranking on Spreading Santorum: [link]
@AIM4SEO » 03 Mar '12, 5am
"Spreading Santorum" Drops At Google; New Site Keeps Anal Sex Definition At Number One [link] @sengineland h/t @dannysullivan
@justin_hart » 02 Mar '12, 4pm
Wow? Santorum finally knocks down the nasty Google bomb one notch - [link]
@miradu » 02 Mar '12, 3pm
And the reign of Santorum finally comes to an end: Thanks Google :( [link]
@ip_seo » 02 Mar '12, 11am
Spreading Santorum has dropped a few places. [link]
@therealprotonk » 02 Mar '12, 5am
Good reporting by SEL on Google's santorum/Santorum change [link] I don't object on principle but this degrades search quality
@andy_klein » 02 Mar '12, 3am
Giggle-worthy as always, yet remains a fascinating SEO case study RT @sengineland: "Spreading Santorum" Drops At Google [link]
@adelgado » 01 Mar '12, 9pm
RT @delia2d: Hoy, en historias tranquilizadoras sobre Google: los resultados de búsqueda de Santorum [link]
@shoshido » 01 Mar '12, 9pm
I won't vote for him. But the grace Santorum has shown in the face of unprecedented cyber-bullying has been exemplary. [link]
@delia2d » 01 Mar '12, 9pm
Hoy, en historias tranquilizadoras sobre Google: los resultados de búsqueda de Santorum [link]
@nxthompson » 01 Mar '12, 9pm
Wow. Google gives Santorum some love. [link] via @sengineland
@markopp1 » 01 Mar '12, 9pm
did Google cave to Rick Santorum against Dan Savage? all the intrigue here: [link]
@Rig_Daddy » 01 Mar '12, 9pm
Google changes search engine to help Rick Santorum with his 'Google Problem'! [link]
@BreakingCopy » 01 Mar '12, 8pm
Google finally bumps anal sex definition from top search result for "Santorum." [link] via @sengineland
@Worthwhile » 01 Mar '12, 8pm
RT @ChrisRackley: Google solved the "Santorum" debacle, and did it by modifying, but not cheating, their algorithm: [link]
@justnisdead » 01 Mar '12, 6pm
Boooo // Santorum: No Longer A Byproduct Of Anal Sex, According To Google [link] via @prismatic
@ChrisRackley » 01 Mar '12, 6pm
Google solved the "Santorum" debacle, and did it by modifying, but not cheating, their algorithm: [link]
@toddjolmstead » 01 Mar '12, 6pm
Hmm. @dannysullivan looks at the recent changes in Google search results for "santorum" [link]
@skyesepp » 01 Mar '12, 5pm
RT @SpreadSantorum: If you are freaking out about Google right now, read this [link]
@SpreadSantorum » 01 Mar '12, 5pm
If you are freaking out about Google right now, read this [link]
@LenGilbert08 » 01 Mar '12, 5pm
interesting post for those following Google Santorum issue. “Looks like Google finally folded on the Santorum issue. [link]”
@sengineland » 01 Mar '12, 5pm
RT @jenrobinson: Looks like Google finally folded on the Santorum issue. [link]
@GeekNStereo » 01 Mar '12, 4pm
RT @SixPackRadio: Santorum's Google problem might be going away. A damn shame: [link]
@inthemilk » 01 Mar '12, 4pm
Interesting. RT @stevesilberman Danny Sullivan on the sudden ejection of "santorum" from Google's top results. #GOP [link]
@SixPackRadio » 01 Mar '12, 4pm
Santorum's Google problem might be going away. A damn shame: [link]
@MikeForester » 01 Mar '12, 4pm
RT @stevesilberman: Danny Sullivan on the sudden ejection of "santorum" from Google's top results. #GOP [link]
@stevesilberman » 01 Mar '12, 4pm
Danny Sullivan on the sudden ejection of "santorum" from Google's top results. #GOP [link]
@JohnCzahor » 01 Mar '12, 2pm
RT @Jonnymagic00: I think it's pretty clear that Google manually KOed "Santorum" search results. Pathetic. [link]
@Jonnymagic00 » 01 Mar '12, 2pm
I think it's pretty clear that Google manually KOed "Santorum" search results. Pathetic. [link]
@DarrenRavens » 01 Mar '12, 11am
It's not every day that my SEO reading relates to the 'byproducts of anal sex' - [link]
@astrongrhythm » 01 Mar '12, 6am
"'Spreading Santorum' Drops At Google" [link] #lamesauce
@colinjones » 01 Mar '12, 2am
"Spreading Santorum" drops in the Google rankings [link] via @ethanklapper
@bnnejn » 01 Mar '12, 2am
whoa...whoa...I am without words [link]
@P_Pavia » 01 Mar '12, 1am
"Spreading #Santorum" New Site Keeps Anal Sex Definition At Number One: #GOP [link] via @sengineland
@TerminatorBarbi » 01 Mar '12, 12am
RT @frishsticks: [link] pls retweet. Must keep santorum bomb alive!
@frishsticks » 01 Mar '12, 12am
[link] pls retweet. Must keep santorum bomb alive!
@_imBman_ » 29 Feb '12, 11pm
@danieltosh Google to stop the spreading of Santorum :( [link]
@jenrobinson » 29 Feb '12, 10pm
Looks like Google finally folded on the Santorum issue. [link]
@AngelaEpley » 29 Feb '12, 10pm
#nevergetsold - "Spreading Santorum" Drops At Google; New Site Keeps NSFW Definition At Number One [link] via @sengineland
@raulagrait » 29 Feb '12, 9pm
.@dannysullivan educates us on the many twists and turns on the slippery road that is Santorum's search engine ranking: [link]
@zamosta » 29 Feb '12, 8pm
1000+ words analyzing search relevancy and new changes re: Santorum. The one and only @dannysullivan, ladies and gents. [link]
@TimoSchuurbiers » 29 Feb '12, 8pm
The guy who's telling lies about The Netherlands dropped in Google;-) [link]
@bretwilhite » 29 Feb '12, 7pm
"@fmanjoo: What if Santorum's entire campaign was just an elaborate way of changing his Google results? [link]" soo ingenious?
@top10traffic » 29 Feb '12, 7pm
“Spreading Santorum” Drops At Google; New Site Keeps Anal Sex Definition At ... [link] - #mktg